PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHCGX vs. BBLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCGX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than BBLIX's 1.58% return.


CHCGX

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.87%
YTD
3.76%
6M
4.51%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
10.89%

BBLIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.58%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CHCGX
Chesapeake Growth Fund
3.76%16.21%10.98%24.70%-28.72%15.48%24.23%9.35%
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
1.58%12.07%15.83%23.86%-20.59%27.23%12.30%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCGX and BBLIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between CHCGX and BBLIX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHCGX vs. BBLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHCGX
CHCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CHCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CHCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLIX
BBLIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BBLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHCGXBBLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.98

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

5.72

-0.44

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the BBLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCGX and BBLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHCGXBBLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.55

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.57

-0.19

Drawdowns

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCGX drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than BBLIX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCGX and BBLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHCGXBBLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.09%

-33.49%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.44%

-3.63%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-14.68%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-28.06%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.80%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.42%

-6.35%

-8.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.43%

+1.00%

Volatility

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Volatility Comparison

Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CHCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHCGXBBLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

0.00%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

4.76%

+5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

7.86%

+4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

15.93%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

18.55%

+0.24%

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHCGX has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHCGX vs. BBLIX - Dividend Comparison

CHCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, less than BBLIX's 9.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
9.39%9.54%4.20%0.28%1.45%3.27%0.34%0.04%
CHCGX
Chesapeake Growth Fund
7.38%7.65%1.51%0.00%0.00%5.42%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHCGX and BBLIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHCGX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to BBLIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCGX dropped -60.09% vs BBLIX's -33.49%.

CHCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHCGX and BBLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer