CHAU vs. XTAP
CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CHAU is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHAU returned -9.67%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for XTAP. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHAU charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
CHAU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a 17.74% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 10.96% return.
CHAU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 80.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 17.74% | 47.73% | 6.61% | -28.25% | -49.17% | 1.88% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 17.58% | 14.26% | 23.46% | -14.68% | 11.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAU and XTAP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.26 |
CHAU vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHAU
XTAP
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
CHAU
XTAP
Financial Services
CHAU
XTAP
Industrials
CHAU
XTAP
Basic Materials
CHAU
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
CHAU
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
CHAU
XTAP
Healthcare
CHAU
XTAP
Utilities
CHAU
XTAP
Energy
CHAU
XTAP
Communication Services
CHAU
XTAP
Real Estate
CHAU
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
CHAU
XTAP
CHAU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 2.22 | -0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.29 | 14.82 | -9.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.85 | 78.70 | -62.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 4.50 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.76 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.80 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
CHAU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.21% | -22.13% | -57.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -1.42% | -13.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.88% | -11.83% | -48.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.69% | -22.13% | -51.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.49% | -0.21% | -52.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.90% | -3.45% | -55.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 0.27% | +4.81% |
Volatility
CHAU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a higher volatility of 11.70% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that CHAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.70% | 1.10% | +10.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.78% | 3.16% | +19.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.37% | 4.70% | +28.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.08% | 14.54% | +32.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.14% | 14.41% | +32.73% |
CHAU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 1.73% | 1.97% | 2.25% | 3.97% | 0.77% | 1.73% | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.83% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAU has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAU dropped -79.21% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 5-year performance, XTAP leads with 10.99% vs -9.67% for CHAU. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 10.99% return vs -9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.
CHAU has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAU and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer