CHAU vs. SPXS
CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index (200%), while SPXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHAU returned 4.49%/yr vs -41.99%/yr for SPXS. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. CHAU charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
CHAU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -26.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CHAU has outperformed SPXS with an annualized return of 4.49%, while SPXS has yielded a comparatively lower -41.99% annualized return.
CHAU
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 23.10%
- 1Y
- 75.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- -9.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
SPXS
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- YTD
- -26.34%
- 6M
- -25.57%
- 1Y
- -49.42%
- 3Y*
- -43.02%
- 5Y*
- -34.91%
- 10Y*
- -41.99%
CHAU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 16.35% | 47.73% | 6.61% | -28.25% | -49.17% | -2.84% | 71.95% | 70.01% | -51.03% | 74.91% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -26.34% | -41.53% | -42.84% | -45.97% | 36.14% | -58.11% | -70.47% | -56.40% | 3.44% | -44.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAU and SPXS is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2015 | -0.40 |
The correlation between CHAU and SPXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (all time) to -0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
CHAU
SPXS
CHAU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.75 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | -0.98 | +5.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.80 | -1.64 | +16.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | -1.40 | +3.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | -0.70 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | -0.79 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -0.84 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
CHAU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.21% | -100.00% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -50.77% | +35.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.88% | -84.13% | +24.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.69% | -90.11% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.58% | -99.63% | +21.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.04% | -100.00% | +46.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.90% | -96.30% | +37.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 30.20% | -25.11% |
Volatility
CHAU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a higher volatility of 11.75% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 8.36%. This indicates that CHAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.75% | 8.36% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.75% | 26.83% | -4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.38% | 35.52% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.07% | 50.38% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.13% | 53.53% | -6.40% |
CHAU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than SPXS's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 1.75% | 1.97% | 2.25% | 3.97% | 0.77% | 1.73% | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.83% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.97% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAU has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to SPXS (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAU dropped -79.21% vs SPXS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, CHAU leads with 4.49% vs -41.99% for SPXS. On fees, SPXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHAU has performed better with a 4.49% return vs -41.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.
SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.75% for CHAU.
CHAU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%), while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 1.08% for SPXS.
CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAU and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer