CHAU vs. DRV
CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) and DRV (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAU is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index (200%), while DRV is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHAU returned 2.81%/yr vs -28.22%/yr for DRV. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. CHAU charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for DRV.
Performance
CHAU vs. DRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than DRV's -33.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CHAU has outperformed DRV with an annualized return of 2.81%, while DRV has yielded a comparatively lower -28.22% annualized return.
CHAU
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -13.41%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 35.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- -10.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
DRV
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -11.89%
- 6M
- -23.58%
- YTD
- -33.09%
- 1Y
- -27.92%
- 3Y*
- -23.79%
- 5Y*
- -16.12%
- 10Y*
- -28.22%
CHAU vs. DRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 0.33% | 47.73% | 6.61% | -28.25% | -49.17% | -2.84% | 71.95% | 70.01% | -51.03% | 74.91% |
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | -33.09% | -7.27% | -10.50% | -33.74% | 68.51% | -68.77% | -60.48% | -51.70% | 5.07% | -17.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAU and DRV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAU vs. DRV — Risk / Return Rank
CHAU
DRV
CHAU vs. DRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHAU | DRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.91 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | -0.79 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | -1.64 | +7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHAU vs. DRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, smaller than the maximum DRV drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and DRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAU | DRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.21% | -99.99% | +20.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.27% | -35.30% | +16.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.88% | -72.95% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.97% | -75.28% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.58% | -97.51% | +18.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.51% | -99.99% | +40.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.83% | -97.76% | +38.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 17.10% | -11.03% |
Volatility
CHAU vs. DRV - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a higher volatility of 18.68% compared to Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) at 16.05%. This indicates that CHAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAU | DRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.68% | 16.05% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.66% | 33.32% | -3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.62% | 42.96% | -4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.64% | 57.23% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.41% | 62.82% | -15.41% |
CHAU vs. DRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than DRV's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAU vs. DRV - Dividend Comparison
CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than DRV's 4.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 2.16% | 1.97% | 2.25% | 3.97% | 0.77% | 1.73% | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.83% |
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | 4.04% | 2.88% | 4.57% | 5.35% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.71% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAU and DRV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAU has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to DRV (16.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAU dropped -79.21% vs DRV's -99.99%.
On 10-year performance, CHAU leads with 2.81% vs -28.22% for DRV. On fees, DRV is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, DRV has been the lower-risk option at 16.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHAU has performed better with a 2.81% return vs -28.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRV is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.
DRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 2.16% for CHAU.
CHAU is categorized as China Equities, while DRV is REIT. CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%), while DRV tracks MSCI US REIT Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 1.08% for DRV.
CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAU and DRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer