PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAT vs. YBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHAT vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 74.30% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -23.39% return.


CHAT

1D
-0.66%
1M
27.78%
YTD
74.30%
6M
73.13%
1Y
144.01%
3Y*
55.51%
5Y*
10Y*

YBTC

1D
-2.77%
1M
-16.32%
YTD
-23.39%
6M
-26.70%
1Y
-35.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
74.30%49.85%30.56%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
-23.39%-4.23%58.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and YBTC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHAT vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHATYBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

0.85

+0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.90

-0.76

+9.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.26

-1.39

+27.65

CHAT vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.72, which is higher than the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHATYBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72

-0.91

+5.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

0.16

+1.82

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and YBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHATYBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-47.09%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

-47.09%

+30.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-44.06%

+43.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-12.89%

+7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

25.69%

-20.18%

Volatility

CHAT vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 11.70% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 8.85%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHATYBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

8.85%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.62%

31.81%

-7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

39.20%

-8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

40.81%

-10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.90%

40.81%

-10.91%

CHAT vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHAT vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than YBTC's 88.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
1.64%2.85%0.00%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
88.13%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHAT and YBTC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAT has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to YBTC (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs YBTC's -47.09%.

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 144.01% vs -35.71% for YBTC. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 144.01% return vs -35.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 1.64% for CHAT.

CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.95% for YBTC.

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHAT and YBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer