PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAT vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHAT vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHAT vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
9.04%49.85%9.92%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
-2.43%12.60%16.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than XDTE's -2.43% return.


CHAT

1D
3.95%
1M
0.86%
YTD
9.04%
6M
5.64%
1Y
87.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDTE

1D
1.03%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-2.43%
6M
0.99%
1Y
13.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHAT vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CHAT vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHATXDTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

0.90

+1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

1.21

+1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.19

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.51

1.12

+4.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.32

4.60

+10.73

CHAT vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and XDTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHATXDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

0.90

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.90

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and XDTE is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CHAT vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than XDTE's 38.73% yield.


Drawdowns

CHAT vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and XDTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHATXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-19.09%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

-12.87%

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-4.87%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-2.44%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

3.14%

+2.72%

Volatility

CHAT vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 4.77%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHATXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.18%

4.77%

+8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.54%

8.90%

+14.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.44%

15.42%

+19.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.33%

14.07%

+15.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.33%

14.07%

+15.26%