CHAT vs. TSXU
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). CHAT is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
CHAT vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 74.30% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 74.30% | -3.12% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and TSXU is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
TSXU
CHAT vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 4.53 | -2.55 |
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -35.62% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.92% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -10.56% | +5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | — | — |
Volatility
CHAT vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.74% | 78.68% | -47.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 78.68% | -48.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 78.68% | -48.78% |
CHAT vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAT vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and TSXU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.20% for TSXU.
CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer