CHAT vs. SOXX
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. CHAT is actively managed, while SOXX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 55.51%/yr vs 57.39%/yr for SOXX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
CHAT vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 74.30% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
CHAT vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 74.30% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 30.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and SOXX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CHAT and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHAT vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHAT
SOXX
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CHAT
SOXX
Communication Services
CHAT
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHAT
SOXX
-
Industrials
CHAT
SOXX
-
Financial Services
CHAT
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
CHAT
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
CHAT
-
SOXX
-
Energy
CHAT
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
CHAT
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
CHAT
-
SOXX
-
Utilities
CHAT
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
SOXX
CHAT vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.74 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.90 | 12.13 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.26 | 46.43 | -20.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72 | 5.61 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 0.45 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -70.21% | +38.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -15.77% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | -41.36% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | 0.00% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -19.97% | +14.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 4.11% | +1.40% |
Volatility
CHAT vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is 11.70%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that CHAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.70% | 14.03% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.62% | 27.35% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.74% | 34.18% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 36.11% | -6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 33.43% | -3.53% |
CHAT vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAT vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and SOXX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to CHAT (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 3-year performance, SOXX leads with 57.39% vs 55.51% for CHAT. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CHAT has been the lower-risk option at 11.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 57.39% return vs 55.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 4.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer