PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAT vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHAT vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 58.75% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.65% return.


CHAT

1D
3.25%
1M
8.61%
YTD
58.75%
6M
54.05%
1Y
117.08%
3Y*
50.33%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
-2.65%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
8.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
58.75%49.85%30.98%9.73%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.65%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and SHLD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.37

CHAT vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHAT
SHLD

Technology

76.5%
11.8%

Communication Services

16.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%

-

Industrials

0.8%
88.2%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CHAT
76.5%
SHLD
11.8%

Communication Services

CHAT
16.6%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

CHAT
5.6%
SHLD

-

Industrials

CHAT
0.8%
SHLD
88.2%

Financial Services

CHAT
0.0%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Energy

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Healthcare

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Real Estate

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Utilities

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHAT vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHATSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.08

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.23

0.45

+6.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.00

1.16

+19.84

CHAT vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHATSHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63

0.37

+3.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

1.98

-0.20

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHATSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-20.10%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

-20.10%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.52%

-19.16%

+9.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-3.26%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

7.78%

-2.18%

Volatility

CHAT vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 15.95% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 7.64%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHATSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.95%

7.64%

+8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.06%

19.39%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.47%

24.20%

+8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.45%

21.14%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.45%

21.14%

+9.31%

CHAT vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHAT vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
1.80%2.85%0.00%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHAT and SHLD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAT has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to SHLD (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 117.08% vs 8.97% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 117.08% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.50% for SHLD.

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHAT and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer