PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAT vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHAT vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 47.03% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -6.71% return.


CHAT

1D
5.60%
1M
-15.29%
6M
45.45%
YTD
47.03%
1Y
76.67%
3Y*
45.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
48.27%

SHLD

1D
0.37%
1M
-2.98%
6M
-21.51%
YTD
-6.71%
1Y
-1.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
37.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
47.03%49.85%30.98%9.93%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-6.71%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and SHLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.34

CHAT vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHAT
SHLD

Technology

78.9%
11.6%

Communication Services

15.2%

-

Industrials

3.6%
88.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CHAT
78.9%
SHLD
11.6%

Communication Services

CHAT
15.2%
SHLD

-

Industrials

CHAT
3.6%
SHLD
88.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CHAT
2.3%
SHLD

-

Financial Services

CHAT
0.0%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Energy

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Healthcare

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Real Estate

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Utilities

CHAT

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHAT vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHATSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.01

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

-0.05

+3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

-0.13

+11.11

CHAT vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHATSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-25.40%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.26%

-25.40%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.70%

-22.53%

+5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-3.98%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.01%

10.59%

-3.58%

Volatility

CHAT vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 16.70% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 7.92%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHATSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.70%

7.92%

+8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.87%

19.75%

+13.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.57%

25.08%

+12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.94%

21.49%

+10.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.94%

21.49%

+10.45%

CHAT vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHAT vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than SHLD's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
1.94%2.85%0.00%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.70%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHAT and SHLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAT has higher volatility (16.70%) compared to SHLD (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 76.67% vs -1.36% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 76.67% return vs -1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.70% for SHLD.

CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.50% for SHLD.

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHAT and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer