CHAT vs. PBOT
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.
Performance
CHAT vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 39.01% return, which is significantly higher than PBOT's 24.27% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.64%
- YTD
- 39.01%
- 1Y
- 68.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.20%
PBOT
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- 22.08%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $58.63M | $57.19M | $67.40M | |
| $18.25K | $25.15K | $21.82K |
CHAT vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 39.01% | -4.26% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 24.27% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and PBOT is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHAT vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHAT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and PBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -15.78% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.25% | -7.70% | -13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -4.51% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | — | — |
Volatility
CHAT vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.18% | 26.96% | +12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.41% | 26.96% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.41% | 26.96% | +5.45% |
CHAT vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAT vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than PBOT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.05% | 2.85% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.08% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and PBOT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.08% for PBOT.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.70% for PBOT.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and PBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer