PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAT vs. ALAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHAT vs. ALAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHAT vs. ALAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
4.90%49.85%30.98%19.23%
ALAFX
Alger Focus Equity A Fund
-13.66%39.65%51.72%18.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than ALAFX's -13.66% return.


CHAT

1D
4.72%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
4.90%
6M
3.42%
1Y
82.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ALAFX

1D
-1.70%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-13.66%
6M
-14.20%
1Y
35.99%
3Y*
31.99%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
18.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHAT vs. ALAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ALAFX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CHAT vs. ALAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAFX
ALAFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ALAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. ALAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHATALAFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

1.31

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

1.89

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

1.84

+3.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.74

6.30

+7.44

CHAT vs. ALAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the ALAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and ALAFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHATALAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.31

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.79

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and ALAFX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CHAT vs. ALAFX - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than ALAFX's 9.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
2.72%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ALAFX
Alger Focus Equity A Fund
9.16%7.91%0.00%0.10%0.06%14.09%6.28%1.98%5.41%

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. ALAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum ALAFX drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and ALAFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHATALAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-43.65%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

-17.58%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.73%

-17.58%

+10.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-7.75%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

5.14%

+0.71%

Volatility

CHAT vs. ALAFX - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 13.21% compared to Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX) at 7.56%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHATALAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.21%

7.56%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.24%

16.38%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.27%

27.14%

+7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.27%

26.07%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.27%

23.85%

+5.42%