CHAT vs. AGIQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. CHAT is actively managed, while AGIQ is passively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AGIQ.

Performance

CHAT vs. AGIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 39.01% return, which is significantly higher than AGIQ's 5.61% return.

CHAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -7.69%
• 6M: 32.64%
• YTD: 39.01%
• 1Y: 68.87%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.20%

AGIQ

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -1.21%
• 6M: 6.78%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	$89.14K	$98.01K	$199.12K
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$58.63M	$57.19M	$67.40M

CHAT vs. AGIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	39.01%	14.53%
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	5.61%	13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and AGIQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025	0.73

CHAT vs. AGIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAT	AGIQ
Technology	78.9%	56.0%
Communication Services	15.2%	6.0%
Industrials	3.6%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	9.5%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	13.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. AGIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

AGIQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHAT vs. AGIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	AGIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	—	—

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. AGIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than AGIQ's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and AGIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	AGIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-19.72%	-11.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.25%	-6.46%	-14.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-6.27%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	AGIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.18%	23.79%	+15.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.41%	23.79%	+8.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.41%	23.79%	+8.62%

CHAT vs. AGIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AGIQ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. AGIQ - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than AGIQ's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	1.91%	0.38%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.05%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and AGIQ in my portfolio?

CHAT and AGIQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or AGIQ?

On fees, AGIQ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or AGIQ?

AGIQ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or AGIQ?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.91% for AGIQ.

What is the main difference between CHAT and AGIQ?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.69% for AGIQ.