PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAIX achieves a 25.61% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 10.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHAIX having a 18.37% annualized return and FCNTX not far behind at 17.96%.


CHAIX

1D
0.96%
1M
3.91%
YTD
25.61%
6M
26.26%
1Y
50.62%
3Y*
32.98%
5Y*
18.89%
10Y*
18.37%

FCNTX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.97%
6M
10.79%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
27.28%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
17.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHAIX
Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class
25.61%20.67%38.77%26.00%-20.32%22.36%18.41%41.69%-3.87%24.73%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
10.97%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAIX and FCNTX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2007

0.92

The correlation between CHAIX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHAIX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAIX
CHAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHAIXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.15

2.31

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.15

9.69

+11.46

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAIX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAIX drawdown since its inception was -50.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAIX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHAIXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.61%

-49.19%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.86%

-11.30%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.40%

-19.75%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-32.59%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.36%

-32.59%

+2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.48%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-8.15%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.69%

-0.29%

Volatility

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 5.94%. This indicates that CHAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHAIXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

5.94%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.34%

11.74%

+2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

14.92%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

19.30%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

19.74%

-0.65%

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHAIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

CHAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than FCNTX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHAIX
Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class
6.53%8.20%18.32%5.36%5.09%18.78%7.39%21.65%12.33%11.44%8.83%9.93%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.21%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHAIX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAIX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to FCNTX (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAIX dropped -50.61% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

CHAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHAIX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer