CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGXF.TO (CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGXF.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by CI, while ENCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CGXF.TO returned 10.53%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGXF.TO charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ENCC.TO.

Performance

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXF.TO achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 29.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CGXF.TO has outperformed ENCC.TO with an annualized return of 10.53%, while ENCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.

CGXF.TO

• 1D: -2.68%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: -2.14%
• 6M: 2.55%
• 1Y: 44.73%
• 3Y*: 30.89%
• 5Y*: 17.02%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

ENCC.TO

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 29.01%
• 6M: 25.71%
• 1Y: 41.57%
• 3Y*: 22.89%
• 5Y*: 25.31%
• 10Y*: 8.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common	-2.14%	114.19%	11.88%	1.43%	1.89%	-6.21%	15.23%	20.53%	-18.76%	5.51%
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF	29.01%	13.13%	17.39%	5.72%	41.33%	80.55%	-27.98%	6.54%	-31.00%	-18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CGXF.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2011	0.19

The correlation between CGXF.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGXF.TO	ENCC.TO
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXF.TO

CGXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 31
CGXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CGXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CGXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CGXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CGXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

ENCC.TO

ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGXF.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	2.98	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	3.81	-2.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.53	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	4.93	-3.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	17.54	-13.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXF.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGXF.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	2.98	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	1.11	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.29	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.00	+0.05

Drawdowns

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXF.TO and ENCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGXF.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.66%	-89.91%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.39%	-8.48%	-18.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.39%	-16.67%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.19%	-25.57%	-11.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.68%	-82.16%	+42.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.36%	-1.99%	-22.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.71%	-39.82%	+9.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.76%	2.38%	+8.38%

Volatility

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.76% compared to Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) at 5.66%. This indicates that CGXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGXF.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.76%	5.66%	+9.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.10%	12.36%	+19.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.82%	14.08%	+25.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.85%	23.03%	+7.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.30%	29.05%	+1.25%

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXF.TO has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGXF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.61%, more than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common	12.61%	7.43%	8.09%	8.92%	8.54%	8.59%	11.01%	6.69%	7.97%	6.99%	10.68%	11.75%
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF	11.09%	13.62%	14.58%	14.87%	12.55%	4.23%	5.10%	6.09%	8.35%	6.92%	4.77%	15.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGXF.TO and ENCC.TO in my portfolio?

CGXF.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGXF.TO or ENCC.TO?

On fees, ENCC.TO is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGXF.TO or ENCC.TO?

ENCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CGXF.TO.

What is the main difference between CGXF.TO and ENCC.TO?

CGXF.TO is categorized as Gold, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CI and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CGXF.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.