CGVV vs. SPLV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV).

CGVV and SPLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGVV is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 24, 2025. SPLV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. It was launched on May 5, 2011.

Performance

CGVV vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGVV vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	0.11%	6.41%
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF	3.24%	0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGVV achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPLV's 3.24% return.

CGVV

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -5.92%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPLV

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -5.14%
• YTD: 3.24%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 0.27%
• 3Y*: 7.81%
• 5Y*: 6.88%
• 10Y*: 8.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGVV vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.

CGVV

Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF

SPLV

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

Return for Risk

CGVV vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV

SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 12
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 11
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGVV vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGVV	SPLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.69	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CGVV and SPLV is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CGVV vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison

CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SPLV's 2.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	0.57%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF	2.12%	2.04%	1.88%	2.45%	2.11%	1.51%	2.12%	2.08%	2.18%	2.03%	2.03%	2.28%

Drawdowns

CGVV vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and SPLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGVV	SPLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-36.26%	+26.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.22%	-5.14%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-3.54%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGVV	SPLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.53%	12.68%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.53%	12.43%	+1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.53%	15.35%	-1.82%