CGVV vs. DLN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CGVV is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. Over the past year, CGVV returned 29.35% vs 22.57% for DLN. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CGVV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.

Performance

CGVV vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGVV achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 13.81% return.

CGVV

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: 3.35%
• 6M: 11.37%
• YTD: 18.48%
• 1Y: 29.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.51%

DLN

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 2.28%
• 6M: 9.47%
• YTD: 13.81%
• 1Y: 22.57%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: 12.58%
• ALL TIME*: 9.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	$1.16M	$1.65M	$1.67M
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	$10.06M	$9.95M	$12.21M

CGVV vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	18.48%	6.55%
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	13.81%	10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CGVV and DLN is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.81

The correlation between CGVV and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CGVV vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGVV

CGVV Risk / Return Rank: 82
CGVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CGVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CGVV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CGVV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

DLN

DLN Risk / Return Rank: 92
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGVV vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGVV	DLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.53	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	3.58	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.46	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.72	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.97	15.65	-3.68

CGVV vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGVV and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGVV vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and DLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGVV	DLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-57.84%	+47.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.11%	-6.10%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-7.47%	+5.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	1.45%	+1.01%

Volatility

CGVV vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.34%. This indicates that CGVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGVV	DLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	2.34%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	6.92%	+3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.90%	8.99%	+4.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	13.24%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	16.12%	-2.39%

CGVV vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGVV vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than DLN's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	0.82%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	1.74%	1.90%	2.00%	2.43%	2.53%	2.01%	2.66%	2.51%	2.90%	2.33%	2.64%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGVV and DLN in my portfolio?

CGVV and DLN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGVV or DLN?

CGVV has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to DLN (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGVV dropped -10.11% vs DLN's -57.84%.

Which ETF is better, CGVV or DLN?

On 1-year performance, CGVV leads with 29.35% vs 22.57% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGVV or DLN?

Over the 1-year period, CGVV has performed better with a 29.35% return vs 22.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGVV or DLN?

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGVV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGVV or DLN?

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.82% for CGVV.

What is the main difference between CGVV and DLN?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.28% for DLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.