CGV vs. ASCI
CGV (Conductor Global Equity Value ETF) and ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGV charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ASCI.
Performance
CGV vs. ASCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGV achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than ASCI's 7.18% return.
CGV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.55%
ASCI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $170.41K | $109.10K | $88.47K | |
| $256.61K | $205.17K | $302.24K |
CGV vs. ASCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 10.56% | 4.24% |
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 7.18% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGV and ASCI is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGV vs. ASCI — Risk / Return Rank
CGV
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGV vs. ASCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) and abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGV | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGV vs. ASCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGV drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, which is greater than ASCI's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGV and ASCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGV | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.64% | -11.22% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.98% | -3.04% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -2.92% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | — | — |
Volatility
CGV vs. ASCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGV | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 19.23% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 19.23% | -5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 19.23% | -5.55% |
CGV vs. ASCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGV has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGV vs. ASCI - Dividend Comparison
CGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than ASCI's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 4.74% | 4.58% | 2.87% | 4.56% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGV and ASCI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for CGV.
CGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 0.75% for ASCI.
They also come from different issuers: Conductor and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for CGV and 0.70% for ASCI.
Find the right allocation for CGV and ASCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer