PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGUI vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGUI vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with CGUI at 1.50% and VBIL at 1.50%.


CGUI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUI vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGUI and VBIL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGUI vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUI
CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUI vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGUIVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-28.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.66

21.10

-18.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.99

42.61

-17.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

105.06

532.54

-427.48

CGUI vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUI Sharpe Ratio is 5.99, which is lower than the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 15.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUI and VBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGUIVBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.99

15.17

-9.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.20

13.44

-7.23

Drawdowns

CGUI vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUI drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUI and VBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGUIVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-0.09%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-0.09%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.00%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.01%

+0.03%

Volatility

CGUI vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) has a higher volatility of 0.30% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that CGUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGUIVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.06%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.56%

0.16%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74%

0.26%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.80%

0.30%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.80%

0.30%

+0.50%

CGUI vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGUI vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

CGUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than VBIL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
3.89%4.17%2.62%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGUI and VBIL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGUI has higher volatility (0.30%) compared to VBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUI dropped -0.18% vs VBIL's -0.09%.

On 1-year performance, CGUI leads with 4.42% vs 3.93% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGUI has performed better with a 4.42% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CGUI.

CGUI has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CGUI and 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.17 vs 5.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGUI and VBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer