CGUI vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGUI (Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGUI returned 4.42% vs 4.67% for MINT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGUI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

CGUI vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGUI achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return.

CGUI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.84%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUI vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	1.50%	4.99%	3.03%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.81%	4.74%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUI and MINT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	0.06

Return for Risk

CGUI vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUI

CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUI vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGUI	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.99	17.09	-11.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.92	65.54	-54.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.66	20.53	-17.87
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.99	94.30	-69.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	105.06	939.26	-834.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGUI vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUI Sharpe Ratio is 5.99, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUI and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGUI	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.99	17.09	-11.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	2.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.20	2.47	+3.74

Drawdowns

CGUI vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUI drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUI and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGUI	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-4.62%	+4.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	-0.05%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.17%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	0.00%	+0.04%

Volatility

CGUI vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) has a higher volatility of 0.30% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that CGUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGUI	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.30%	0.09%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.56%	0.20%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74%	0.27%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.80%	0.58%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.80%	0.95%	-0.15%

CGUI vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGUI vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

CGUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	3.89%	4.17%	2.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGUI and MINT in my portfolio?

CGUI and MINT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGUI or MINT?

CGUI has higher volatility (0.30%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUI dropped -0.18% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which ETF is better, CGUI or MINT?

On 1-year performance, MINT leads with 4.67% vs 4.42% for CGUI. On fees, CGUI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGUI or MINT?

Over the 1-year period, MINT has performed better with a 4.67% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGUI or MINT?

CGUI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGUI or MINT?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.89% for CGUI.

What is the main difference between CGUI and MINT?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CGUI and 0.36% for MINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs 5.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.