CGUI vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CGUI (Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGUI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. CGUI is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, CGUI returned 4.21% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGUI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

CGUI vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGUI achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.39% return.

CGUI

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUI vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	1.58%	4.99%	3.05%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.39%	4.96%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUI and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.08

The correlation between CGUI and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CGUI vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUI

CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUI vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGUI	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.78	4.94	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.41	8.90	+1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.56	2.21	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	23.83	16.41	+7.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	99.69	58.11	+41.58

CGUI vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUI Sharpe Ratio is 5.78, which is comparable to the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUI and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGUI vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUI drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, smaller than the maximum IBIC drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUI and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGUI	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.90%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	-0.27%	+0.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.11%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.10%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	0.08%	-0.04%

Volatility

CGUI vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) has a higher volatility of 0.24% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that CGUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGUI	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.24%	0.16%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.56%	0.67%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73%	0.89%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.80%	1.57%	-0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.80%	1.57%	-0.77%

CGUI vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CGUI vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

CGUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF	3.89%	4.17%	2.62%	0.00%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGUI and IBIC in my portfolio?

CGUI and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGUI or IBIC?

CGUI has higher volatility (0.24%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUI dropped -0.18% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, CGUI or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.38% vs 4.21% for CGUI. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGUI or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.38% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGUI or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CGUI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGUI or IBIC?

CGUI has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

What is the main difference between CGUI and IBIC?

CGUI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CGUI and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.78 vs 4.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.