CGUI vs. CLIP
CGUI (Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. CGUI is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, CGUI returned 4.42% vs 3.96% for CLIP. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGUI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.
Performance
CGUI vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with CGUI at 1.50% and CLIP at 1.50%.
CGUI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGUI vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.50% | 4.99% | 3.03% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.50% | 4.23% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGUI and CLIP is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGUI vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank
CGUI
CLIP
CGUI vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGUI | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -61.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.66 | 20.66 | -18.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 24.99 | 142.22 | -117.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 105.06 | 1,151.15 | -1,046.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGUI | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.99 | 17.26 | -11.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.20 | 10.71 | -4.51 |
Drawdowns
CGUI vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGUI drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUI and CLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGUI | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.08% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.18% | -0.03% | -0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -0.00% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.00% | +0.04% |
Volatility
CGUI vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) has a higher volatility of 0.30% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that CGUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGUI | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 0.06% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.56% | 0.14% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74% | 0.23% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.80% | 0.44% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.80% | 0.44% | +0.36% |
CGUI vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGUI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGUI vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison
CGUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, which matches CLIP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGUI Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF | 3.89% | 4.17% | 2.62% | 0.00% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.91% | 4.14% | 5.11% | 2.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGUI and CLIP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGUI has higher volatility (0.30%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUI dropped -0.18% vs CLIP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CGUI leads with 4.42% vs 3.96% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CGUI has performed better with a 4.42% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CGUI.
CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.89% for CGUI.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CGUI and 0.07% for CLIP.
CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.26 vs 5.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGUI and CLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer