PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGUI vs. CGGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGUI vs. CGGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGUI achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than CGGO's 19.37% return.


CGUI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGGO

1D
-0.82%
1M
9.97%
YTD
19.37%
6M
20.83%
1Y
37.51%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUI vs. CGGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
1.50%4.99%3.03%
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
19.37%21.08%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUI and CGGO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.12

The correlation between CGUI and CGGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGUI vs. CGGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUI
CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CGGO
CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUI vs. CGGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) and Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGUICGGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.66

1.40

+1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.99

2.87

+22.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

105.06

13.04

+92.02

CGUI vs. CGGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUI Sharpe Ratio is 5.99, which is higher than the CGGO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUI and CGGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGUICGGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.99

2.25

+3.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.20

0.78

+5.42

Drawdowns

CGUI vs. CGGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUI drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, smaller than the maximum CGGO drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUI and CGGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGUICGGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-24.90%

+24.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-13.15%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.82%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-5.50%

+5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

2.88%

-2.84%

Volatility

CGUI vs. CGGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) is 0.30%, while Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that CGUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGUICGGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

6.68%

-6.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.56%

14.40%

-13.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74%

16.77%

-16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.80%

18.56%

-17.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.80%

18.56%

-17.76%

CGUI vs. CGGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CGGO's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGUI vs. CGGO - Dividend Comparison

CGUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than CGGO's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
1.70%2.03%1.10%0.76%0.59%
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
3.89%4.17%2.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGUI and CGGO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGGO has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to CGUI (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUI dropped -0.18% vs CGGO's -24.90%.

On 1-year performance, CGGO leads with 37.51% vs 4.42% for CGUI. On fees, CGUI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CGUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGGO has performed better with a 37.51% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGUI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGO.

CGUI has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.70% for CGGO.

CGUI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CGGO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CGUI and 0.47% for CGGO.

CGUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGUI and CGGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer