PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGSM vs. CA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGSM vs. CA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGSM vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
0.49%4.58%3.71%0.50%
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
-0.08%3.05%1.51%0.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSM achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than CA's -0.08% return.


CGSM

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CA

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGSM vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGSM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CGSM vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGSM
CGSM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CGSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CA
CA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGSM vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGSMCADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

0.89

+1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

1.17

+2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.21

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.17

+1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.27

3.35

+7.92

CGSM vs. CA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the CA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSM and CA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGSMCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

0.89

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.86

0.57

+2.29

Correlation

The correlation between CGSM and CA is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CGSM vs. CA - Dividend Comparison

CGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than CA's 3.20% yield.


TTM202520242023
CGSM
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
3.06%3.05%3.11%0.84%
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
3.20%3.14%3.03%0.00%

Drawdowns

CGSM vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSM drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum CA drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSM and CA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGSMCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-5.24%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-3.67%

+2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.00%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-1.30%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

1.28%

-0.90%

Volatility

CGSM vs. CA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) is 0.59%, while Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that CGSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGSMCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

1.31%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

1.78%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63%

4.40%

-2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.82%

4.09%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

4.09%

-2.27%