CGSD vs. ZTWO
Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO).
CGSD and ZTWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGSD is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Oct 25, 2022. ZTWO is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024.
Performance
CGSD vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGSD vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 0.21% | 6.11% | 0.37% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.29% | 5.49% | 0.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than ZTWO's 0.29% return.
CGSD
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTWO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGSD vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CGSD vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank
CGSD
ZTWO
CGSD vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGSD | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 2.74 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.17 | 4.28 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.60 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 4.56 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.09 | 20.63 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGSD | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.74 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.43 | 3.24 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGSD and ZTWO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CGSD vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison
CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than ZTWO's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 4.48% | 4.48% | 4.57% | 4.43% | 0.64% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.19% | 4.31% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CGSD vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and ZTWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGSD | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -0.93% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.11% | -0.93% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.49% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -0.10% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 0.21% | +0.03% |
Volatility
CGSD vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGSD | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 0.61% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.96% | 0.89% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68% | 1.53% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 1.50% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 1.50% | +0.69% |