PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGSD vs. ZTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGSD vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGSD vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than ZTWO's 0.29% return.


CGSD

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
0.21%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
10Y*

ZTWO

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
0.29%
6M
1.28%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGSD vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CGSD vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGSD
CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGSD vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGSDZTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

2.74

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.17

4.28

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.60

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

4.56

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.09

20.63

-1.54

CGSD vs. ZTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the ZTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSD and ZTWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGSDZTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.74

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.43

3.24

-0.81

Correlation

The correlation between CGSD and ZTWO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGSD vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than ZTWO's 4.19% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
4.48%4.48%4.57%4.43%0.64%
ZTWO
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.19%4.31%0.39%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CGSD vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and ZTWO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGSDZTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-0.93%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-0.93%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.49%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-0.10%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

0.21%

+0.03%

Volatility

CGSD vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGSDZTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.61%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.96%

0.89%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68%

1.53%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

1.50%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.19%

1.50%

+0.69%