CGSD vs. USTB
CGSD (Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF) and USTB (VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. CGSD is actively managed, while USTB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGSD returned 5.21%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for USTB. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGSD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for USTB.
Performance
CGSD vs. USTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than USTB's 1.19% return.
CGSD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USTB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- —
CGSD vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 0.70% | 6.11% | 5.46% | 5.03% | 1.32% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.19% | 6.08% | 6.49% | 6.69% | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGSD and USTB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between CGSD and USTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGSD vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank
CGSD
USTB
CGSD vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGSD | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.94 | 3.93 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.65 | 6.69 | -2.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.88 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 5.65 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.36 | 25.66 | -7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGSD | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 3.93 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.41 | 1.73 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
CGSD vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum USTB drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and USTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGSD | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -5.32% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.11% | -0.84% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.11% | -1.02% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.04% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -0.66% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.19% | +0.04% |
Volatility
CGSD vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) at 0.33%. This indicates that CGSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGSD | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.33% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | 0.84% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 1.22% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.16% | 2.01% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.16% | 2.01% | +0.15% |
CGSD vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGSD vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison
CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than USTB's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 4.46% | 4.48% | 4.57% | 4.43% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 2.59% | 2.69% | 2.32% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGSD and USTB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGSD has higher volatility (0.39%) compared to USTB (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGSD dropped -1.75% vs USTB's -5.32%.
On 3-year performance, USTB leads with 6.13% vs 5.21% for CGSD. On fees, CGSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USTB has performed better with a 6.13% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for USTB.
USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 4.46% for CGSD.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CGSD and 0.34% for USTB.
USTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGSD and USTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer