CGSD vs. EVSD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CGSD (Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF) and EVSD (Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGSD returned 3.28% vs 3.56% for EVSD. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGSD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EVSD.

Performance

CGSD vs. EVSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CGSD having a 1.06% return and EVSD slightly higher at 1.08%.

CGSD

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 1Y: 3.28%
• 3Y*: 5.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.07%

EVSD

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.05%
• 6M: 0.67%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 1Y: 3.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	$12.97M	$11.74M	$11.40M
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	$6.64M	$6.21M	$7.07M

CGSD vs. EVSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	1.06%	6.11%	3.51%
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	1.08%	6.80%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CGSD and EVSD is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2024	0.77

The correlation between CGSD and EVSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CGSD vs. EVSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGSD

CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 92
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

EVSD

EVSD Risk / Return Rank: 91
EVSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EVSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EVSD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EVSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EVSD Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGSD vs. EVSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGSD	EVSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.54	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	3.87	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.51	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.19	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.73	13.00	+2.72

CGSD vs. EVSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the EVSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSD and EVSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGSD vs. EVSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, which is greater than EVSD's maximum drawdown of -1.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and EVSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGSD	EVSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-1.26%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.11%	-1.26%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.12%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-0.19%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	0.31%	-0.07%

Volatility

CGSD vs. EVSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) is 0.42%, while Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) has a volatility of 0.50%. This indicates that CGSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGSD	EVSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	0.50%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.10%	1.30%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45%	1.59%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.14%	1.93%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.14%	1.93%	+0.21%

CGSD vs. EVSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EVSD's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CGSD vs. EVSD - Dividend Comparison

CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than EVSD's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	4.46%	4.48%	4.57%	4.43%	0.64%
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	4.63%	4.64%	2.91%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGSD and EVSD in my portfolio?

CGSD and EVSD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGSD or EVSD?

EVSD has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to CGSD (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGSD dropped -1.75% vs EVSD's -1.26%.

Which ETF is better, CGSD or EVSD?

On 1-year performance, EVSD leads with 3.56% vs 3.28% for CGSD. On fees, EVSD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGSD or EVSD?

Over the 1-year period, EVSD has performed better with a 3.56% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGSD or EVSD?

EVSD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CGSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGSD or EVSD?

EVSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.46% for CGSD.

What is the main difference between CGSD and EVSD?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CGSD and 0.24% for EVSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.