CGSD vs. DDV
CGSD (Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
CGSD vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.23% return.
CGSD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGSD vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 0.70% | 0.88% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.23% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGSD and DDV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGSD vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
CGSD
DDV
CGSD vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGSD | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.94 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.65 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGSD | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.41 | 2.06 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
CGSD vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum DDV drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGSD | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -1.92% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.12% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -0.35% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | — | — |
Volatility
CGSD vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGSD | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 2.68% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.16% | 2.68% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.16% | 2.68% | -0.52% |
CGSD vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CGSD and DDV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGSD vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 4.46% | 4.48% | 4.57% | 4.43% | 0.64% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGSD and DDV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGSD and DDV have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
CGSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
CGSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Discipline Funds.
Find the right allocation for CGSD and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer