CGSD vs. DDV
CGSD (Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
CGSD vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.35% return.
CGSD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 3.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.07%
DDV
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.97M | $11.74M | $11.40M | |
| $74.78K | $50.90K | $102.48K |
CGSD vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 1.06% | 0.86% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.35% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGSD and DDV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGSD vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
CGSD
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGSD vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGSD | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.73 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGSD vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum DDV drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGSD | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -1.92% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.29% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -0.34% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | — | — |
Volatility
CGSD vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGSD | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45% | 2.64% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 2.64% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 2.64% | -0.50% |
CGSD vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CGSD and DDV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGSD vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF | 4.46% | 4.48% | 4.57% | 4.43% | 0.64% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.62% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGSD and DDV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGSD and DDV have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
CGSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.
CGSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Discipline Funds.
Find the right allocation for CGSD and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer