PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGSD vs. DDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGSD vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.35% return.


CGSD

1D
0.01%
1M
0.05%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.06%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
5.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.07%

DDV

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.06%
6M
1.60%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.97M$11.74M$11.40M
$74.78K$50.90K$102.48K

CGSD vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
1.06%0.86%
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
2.35%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CGSD and DDV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGSD vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGSD
CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGSD vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGSDDDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.73

CGSD vs. DDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGSD vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum DDV drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and DDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGSDDDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-1.92%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.29%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.34%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

Volatility

CGSD vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGSDDDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45%

2.64%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.14%

2.64%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.14%

2.64%

-0.50%

CGSD vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGSD and DDV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGSD vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
4.46%4.48%4.57%4.43%0.64%
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.62%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGSD and DDV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGSD and DDV have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CGSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.

CGSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Discipline Funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGSD and DDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer