CGRWX vs. FGIPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CGRWX (Invesco Comstock Select Fund) and FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CGRWX returned 12.09%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for FGIPX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CGRWX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FGIPX.

Performance

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Comstock Select Fund (CGRWX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGRWX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 23.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CGRWX has underperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.

CGRWX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.77%
• 6M: 7.49%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 1Y: 26.15%
• 3Y*: 13.67%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 12.09%
• ALL TIME*: 12.24%

FGIPX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 3.69%
• 6M: 15.59%
• YTD: 23.14%
• 1Y: 46.78%
• 3Y*: 25.31%
• 5Y*: 17.75%
• 10Y*: 13.17%
• ALL TIME*: 12.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGRWX Invesco Comstock Select Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGRWX Invesco Comstock Select Fund	10.73%	18.61%	11.95%	12.17%	3.29%	30.12%	-0.34%	27.31%	-11.40%	15.95%
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	23.14%	30.18%	15.44%	12.17%	3.28%	21.73%	-4.59%	25.96%	-9.95%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CGRWX and FGIPX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013	0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between CGRWX and FGIPX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CGRWX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGRWX

CGRWX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CGRWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CGRWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CGRWX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
CGRWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CGRWX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FGIPX

FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Select Fund (CGRWX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGRWX	FGIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	3.71	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	5.08	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.66	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	6.07	-3.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	23.50	-14.23

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGRWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGRWX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGRWX drawdown since its inception was -58.28%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRWX and FGIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGRWX	FGIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.28%	-37.32%	-20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-7.26%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.79%	-13.27%	-11.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.79%	-16.19%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.23%	-37.32%	-7.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.34%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.32%	-4.13%	-4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	1.88%	+0.89%

Volatility

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Comstock Select Fund (CGRWX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) at 2.51%. This indicates that CGRWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGRWX	FGIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	2.51%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	8.72%	+0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.99%	11.89%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	14.86%	+3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	17.05%	+3.57%

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGRWX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGRWX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

CGRWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than FGIPX's 9.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGRWX Invesco Comstock Select Fund	12.29%	13.46%	16.99%	5.10%	16.87%	5.35%	2.33%	27.71%	15.07%	5.43%	1.56%	1.20%
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	9.36%	11.68%	12.69%	7.50%	7.35%	12.20%	2.13%	52.72%	25.63%	5.58%	4.22%	5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGRWX and FGIPX in my portfolio?

CGRWX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGRWX or FGIPX?

CGRWX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FGIPX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGRWX dropped -58.28% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.