CGRO vs. YXI
Compare and contrast key facts about CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI).
CGRO and YXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGRO is an actively managed fund by CoreValues Alpha. It was launched on Oct 2, 2023. YXI is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). It was launched on Mar 16, 2010.
Performance
CGRO vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGRO vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF | -11.71% | 20.23% | 14.75% | 2.03% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 7.67% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 7.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGRO achieves a -11.71% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 7.67% return.
CGRO
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -11.71%
- 6M
- -23.59%
- 1Y
- -8.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- -2.11%
- 3Y*
- -9.66%
- 5Y*
- -2.70%
- 10Y*
- -8.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGRO vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGRO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGRO vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
CGRO
YXI
CGRO vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGRO | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | -0.09 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | 0.04 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.06 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | -0.08 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGRO | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | -0.09 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -0.31 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGRO and YXI is -0.87. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CGRO vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
CGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than YXI's 2.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF | 3.17% | 2.48% | 2.47% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.85% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
CGRO vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGRO drawdown since its inception was -27.01%, smaller than the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRO and YXI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGRO | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.01% | -81.15% | +54.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.01% | -29.83% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.54% | -78.02% | +53.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -54.05% | +44.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 22.96% | -11.65% |
Volatility
CGRO vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) have volatilities of 7.39% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGRO | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 7.48% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 14.80% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.79% | 23.78% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.35% | 31.35% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.35% | 27.46% | +1.89% |