CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO
CGRE.TO (CI Global REIT Private Pool) and CGR.TO (iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF) are both REIT funds. CGRE.TO is actively managed, while CGR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGRE.TO returned 4.17%/yr vs 3.93%/yr for CGR.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGRE.TO achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than CGR.TO's 11.85% return.
CGRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
CGR.TO
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.01%
CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRE.TO CI Global REIT Private Pool | 13.75% | 3.39% | 4.66% | 11.66% | -23.63% | 35.03% | 8.96% |
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF | 11.85% | 2.56% | 9.99% | 7.57% | -21.75% | 28.98% | 8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGRE.TO and CGR.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020 | 0.39 |
The correlation between CGRE.TO and CGR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGRE.TO
CGR.TO
CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global REIT Private Pool (CGRE.TO) and iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGRE.TO | CGR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.18 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.34 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 4.37 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.28%, smaller than the maximum CGR.TO drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRE.TO and CGR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGRE.TO | CGR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.28% | -52.90% | +24.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -9.55% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -14.40% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.28% | -28.77% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.02% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -9.94% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.93% | -0.25% |
Volatility
CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global REIT Private Pool (CGRE.TO) and iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGRE.TO | CGR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.97% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 10.43% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 12.67% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 15.09% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 16.56% | -2.16% |
Dividends
CGRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than CGR.TO's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF | 2.23% | 2.51% | 2.52% | 2.59% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.54% | 4.25% | 2.83% | 2.97% |
CGRE.TO CI Global REIT Private Pool | 4.46% | 4.95% | 4.88% | 4.86% | 5.16% | 3.77% | 2.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGRE.TO and CGR.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares.
Find the right allocation for CGRE.TO and CGR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer