CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO
CGRA.TO (CI Global Real Asset Private Pool) and CGXF.TO (CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common) are both exchange-traded funds - CGRA.TO is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by CI, while CGXF.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGRA.TO returned 7.84%/yr vs 17.47%/yr for CGXF.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGRA.TO achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than CGXF.TO's -10.85% return.
CGRA.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 17.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CGXF.TO
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- -10.85%
- 6M
- -11.69%
- 1Y
- 34.42%
- 3Y*
- 29.81%
- 5Y*
- 17.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 15.15% | 7.16% | 10.58% | 6.33% | -9.03% | 20.00% | 6.05% |
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | -10.85% | 114.18% | 11.88% | 1.43% | 1.89% | -6.21% | -6.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGRA.TO and CGXF.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGRA.TO
CGXF.TO
CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) and CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGRA.TO | CGXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.17 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.03 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.91 | 2.60 | +7.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.03%, smaller than the maximum CGXF.TO drawdown of -91.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRA.TO and CGXF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGRA.TO | CGXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.03% | -91.79% | +75.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.43% | -33.65% | +27.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.89% | -33.65% | +25.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.03% | -37.19% | +21.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -31.10% | +31.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -44.90% | +41.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 13.28% | -11.55% |
Volatility
CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) is 2.67%, while CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) has a volatility of 15.71%. This indicates that CGRA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGRA.TO | CGXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 15.71% | -13.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 34.84% | -27.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.43% | 42.29% | -33.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 31.50% | -19.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.68% | 30.66% | -18.98% |
Dividends
CGRA.TO vs. CGXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than CGXF.TO's 13.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 3.56% | 4.02% | 4.14% | 4.39% | 4.46% | 3.89% | 2.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | 13.05% | 7.43% | 8.09% | 8.93% | 8.54% | 8.59% | 11.00% | 6.69% | 7.97% | 6.99% | 10.68% | 4.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGRA.TO and CGXF.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGRA.TO is categorized as Global Allocation, while CGXF.TO is Gold.
Find the right allocation for CGRA.TO and CGXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer