CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO
CGR.TO (iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF) and VEE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGR.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while VEE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CGR.TO returned 3.96%/yr vs 9.01%/yr for VEE.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGR.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for VEE.TO.
Performance
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGR.TO achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than VEE.TO's 13.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CGR.TO has underperformed VEE.TO with an annualized return of 3.96%, while VEE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.01% annualized return.
CGR.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 3.96%
VEE.TO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 13.54%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF | 7.84% | 2.56% | 9.99% | 7.58% | -21.75% | 28.98% | -9.40% | 14.90% | 2.92% | 3.32% |
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 13.54% | 19.32% | 19.06% | 6.24% | -12.78% | 0.05% | 12.32% | 14.33% | -7.95% | 22.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGR.TO and VEE.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011 | 0.40 |
The correlation between CGR.TO and VEE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (5 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGR.TO
VEE.TO
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
CGR.TO
VEE.TO
Financial Services
CGR.TO
VEE.TO
Basic Materials
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Communication Services
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Consumer Defensive
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Energy
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Healthcare
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Industrials
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Technology
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Utilities
CGR.TO
-
VEE.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGR.TO
VEE.TO
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGR.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.39 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.97 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 10.74 | -7.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGR.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 2.08 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.49 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.44 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, which is greater than VEE.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGR.TO and VEE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGR.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.90% | -29.84% | -23.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -10.74% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.40% | -14.97% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -26.10% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.71% | -29.84% | -3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -0.90% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -8.73% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.96% | +0.03% |
Volatility
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) is 3.77%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that CGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGR.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 6.04% | -2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 12.86% | -2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 15.31% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 15.29% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 16.97% | -0.41% |
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGR.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VEE.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGR.TO vs. VEE.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than VEE.TO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF | 2.33% | 2.51% | 2.52% | 2.59% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.54% | 4.25% | 2.83% | 2.97% |
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 1.91% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.83% | 3.35% | 2.18% | 1.61% | 2.71% | 2.21% | 1.89% | 1.99% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGR.TO and VEE.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for CGR.TO.
CGR.TO is categorized as REIT, while VEE.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. CGR.TO tracks Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for CGR.TO and 0.25% for VEE.TO.
Find the right allocation for CGR.TO and VEE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer