CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGR.TO (iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF) and CCOM.TO (CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - CGR.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while CCOM.TO is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGR.TO returned 9.97%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for CCOM.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGR.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for CCOM.TO.

Performance

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGR.TO achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than CCOM.TO's 14.12% return.

CGR.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: 3.96%

CCOM.TO

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 13.88%
• 1Y: 21.03%
• 3Y*: 6.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF	7.84%	2.56%	9.99%	7.58%	4.00%
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units	14.12%	6.96%	5.90%	-2.46%	1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CGR.TO and CCOM.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2022	0.07

Return for Risk

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGR.TO

CGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 21
CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
CGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

CCOM.TO

CCOM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CCOM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CCOM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CCOM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CCOM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGR.TO	CCOM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	2.11	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	2.76	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.41	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	4.75	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.03	14.22	-11.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGR.TO and CCOM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGR.TO	CCOM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	2.11	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.82	-0.55

Drawdowns

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, which is greater than CCOM.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGR.TO and CCOM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGR.TO	CCOM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.90%	-9.79%	-43.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-4.45%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.40%	-8.18%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-4.45%	+1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.98%	-2.96%	-7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	1.48%	+1.51%

Volatility

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) is 3.77%, while CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that CGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGR.TO	CCOM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	4.71%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	8.36%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	10.02%	+2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.01%	8.42%	+6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.56%	8.42%	+8.14%

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGR.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGR.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than CCOM.TO's 7.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units	7.35%	3.48%	6.99%	4.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF	2.33%	2.51%	2.52%	2.59%	2.40%	1.70%	2.22%	2.10%	2.54%	4.25%	2.83%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGR.TO and CCOM.TO in my portfolio?

CGR.TO and CCOM.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGR.TO or CCOM.TO?

On fees, CGR.TO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGR.TO or CCOM.TO?

CGR.TO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CCOM.TO.

What is the main difference between CGR.TO and CCOM.TO?

CGR.TO is categorized as REIT, while CCOM.TO is Commodities. CGR.TO tracks Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while CCOM.TO tracks Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for CGR.TO and 0.73% for CCOM.TO.