PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGNG vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGNG vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGNG vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGNG achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 5.34% return.


CGNG

1D
4.28%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
-1.13%
6M
2.86%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIEM

1D
3.69%
1M
-8.22%
YTD
5.34%
6M
11.28%
1Y
34.56%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGNG vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGNG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGNG vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGNG
CGNG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGNG vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGNGDIEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.88

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

2.51

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.79

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

11.28

-3.33

CGNG vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGNG and DIEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGNGDIEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.88

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.42

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between CGNG and DIEM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGNG vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

CGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than DIEM's 2.90% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGNG
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF
0.69%0.68%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.90%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%

Drawdowns

CGNG vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGNG drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNG and DIEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGNGDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-38.61%

+22.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-12.33%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.06%

-9.09%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-9.86%

+6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.05%

+0.18%

Volatility

CGNG vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) have volatilities of 9.84% and 9.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGNGDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

9.47%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

13.43%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.14%

18.43%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

16.38%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

17.41%

+0.10%