CGMM vs. PTMC

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CGMM (Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF) and PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. CGMM is actively managed, while PTMC is passively managed. Over the past year, CGMM returned 18.92% vs 19.86% for PTMC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGMM charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTMC.

Performance

CGMM vs. PTMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMM achieves a 12.59% return, which is significantly lower than PTMC's 14.88% return.

CGMM

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.72%
• 6M: 6.39%
• YTD: 12.59%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTMC

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.51%
• 6M: 9.33%
• YTD: 14.88%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: 8.53%
• 5Y*: 4.27%
• 10Y*: 6.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMM vs. PTMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF	12.59%	12.15%
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	14.88%	-4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMM and PTMC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025	0.78

The correlation between CGMM and PTMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CGMM vs. PTMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMM

CGMM Risk / Return Rank: 44
CGMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
CGMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CGMM Omega Ratio Rank: 38
CGMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CGMM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

PTMC

PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 49
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMM vs. PTMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGMM	PTMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.26	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.90	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.24	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.16	8.12	-0.95

CGMM vs. PTMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the PTMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMM and PTMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGMM vs. PTMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMM drawdown since its inception was -21.04%, roughly equal to the maximum PTMC drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMM and PTMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMM	PTMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.04%	-20.53%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.09%	-8.89%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-2.04%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.08%	-6.42%	+3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.46%	+0.19%

Volatility

CGMM vs. PTMC - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) at 3.56%. This indicates that CGMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMM	PTMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.56%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	11.67%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	15.83%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	13.27%	+6.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	12.90%	+7.07%

CGMM vs. PTMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than PTMC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGMM vs. PTMC - Dividend Comparison

CGMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than PTMC's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF	0.38%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	1.60%	1.84%	0.87%	1.92%	0.82%	0.12%	0.53%	1.40%	0.89%	0.67%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGMM and PTMC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, CGMM and PTMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGMM or PTMC?

CGMM has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to PTMC (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMM dropped -21.04% vs PTMC's -20.53%.

Which ETF is better, CGMM or PTMC?

On 1-year performance, PTMC leads with 19.86% vs 18.92% for CGMM. On fees, CGMM is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGMM or PTMC?

Over the 1-year period, PTMC has performed better with a 19.86% return vs 18.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGMM or PTMC?

CGMM is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGMM or PTMC?

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.38% for CGMM.

What is the main difference between CGMM and PTMC?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for CGMM and 0.60% for PTMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.