PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGMM vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGMM vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMM achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.89% return.


CGMM

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.79%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.78%
1Y
23.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGDV

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.09%
YTD
11.89%
6M
12.43%
1Y
30.91%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMM vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGMM and CGDV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025

0.81

The correlation between CGMM and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGMM vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGMM
CGDV

Industrials

21.7%
13.2%

Technology

17.6%
34.1%

Financial Services

15.4%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.7%
10.6%

Healthcare

9.0%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
5.5%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.4%

Energy

3.4%
3.8%

Utilities

3.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.1%

Industrials

CGMM
21.7%
CGDV
13.2%

Technology

CGMM
17.6%
CGDV
34.1%

Financial Services

CGMM
15.4%
CGDV
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CGMM
14.7%
CGDV
10.6%

Healthcare

CGMM
9.0%
CGDV
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

CGMM
5.8%
CGDV
5.5%

Communication Services

CGMM
3.5%
CGDV
8.4%

Energy

CGMM
3.4%
CGDV
3.8%

Utilities

CGMM
3.1%
CGDV
2.1%

Basic Materials

CGMM
3.0%
CGDV
2.9%

Real Estate

CGMM
2.8%
CGDV
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGMM vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMM
CGMM Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CGMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGMM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CGMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMM vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGMMCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.50

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

3.18

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

15.06

-6.12

CGMM vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMM and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGMMCGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.68

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.24

-0.43

Drawdowns

CGMM vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMM drawdown since its inception was -21.04%, roughly equal to the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMM and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGMMCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-21.82%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-9.75%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.55%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-3.62%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.06%

+0.56%

Volatility

CGMM vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that CGMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGMMCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.09%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

9.13%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

11.59%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

15.48%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.29%

15.48%

+4.81%

CGMM vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGMM vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

CGMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than CGDV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.17%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%
CGMM
Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF
0.36%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGMM and CGDV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGMM has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to CGDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMM dropped -21.04% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 1-year performance, CGDV leads with 30.91% vs 23.39% for CGMM. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 30.91% return vs 23.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for CGMM.

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.36% for CGMM.

CGMM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for CGMM and 0.33% for CGDV.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGMM and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer