CGLO.TO vs. CCCB.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CGLO.TO (CIBC Global Growth ETF) and CCCB.TO (CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGLO.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by CIBC, while CCCB.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by CIBC. Both are actively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CGLO.TO vs. CCCB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) and CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGLO.TO achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than CCCB.TO's 30.33% return.

CGLO.TO

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 2.26%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 1Y: 9.94%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: —

CCCB.TO

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 7.52%
• 6M: 30.55%
• YTD: 30.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGLO.TO vs. CCCB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF	5.72%	0.78%
CCCB.TO CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF	30.33%	21.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CGLO.TO and CCCB.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.17

Return for Risk

CGLO.TO vs. CCCB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGLO.TO

CGLO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 23
CGLO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CGLO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CGLO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CGLO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CGLO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

CCCB.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGLO.TO vs. CCCB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) and CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGLO.TO	CCCB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.57	—	—

Drawdowns

CGLO.TO vs. CCCB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGLO.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, which is greater than CCCB.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGLO.TO and CCCB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGLO.TO	CCCB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.07%	-7.92%	-17.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.93%	0.00%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-0.93%	-4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGLO.TO	CCCB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.73%	12.85%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	12.85%	+1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	12.85%	+1.39%

Dividends

CGLO.TO vs. CCCB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGLO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CCCB.TO's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CCCB.TO CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF	3.97%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.28%	0.39%	0.31%	0.13%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGLO.TO and CCCB.TO in my portfolio?

CGLO.TO and CCCB.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between CGLO.TO and CCCB.TO?

CGLO.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CCCB.TO is Derivative Income.