CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO
CCCB.TO (CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF) and YAVG.NEO (Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCCB.TO achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly lower than YAVG.NEO's 59.96% return.
CCCB.TO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 15.74%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YAVG.NEO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 16.03%
- YTD
- 59.96%
- 6M
- 46.17%
- 1Y
- 133.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CCCB.TO CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF | 15.74% | 21.01% |
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 59.96% | 20.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCCB.TO and YAVG.NEO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
CCCB.TO
YAVG.NEO
CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB.TO) and Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCCB.TO | YAVG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.21 | 2.03 | +2.18 |
Drawdowns
CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCCB.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.92%, smaller than the maximum YAVG.NEO drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCB.TO and YAVG.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCCB.TO | YAVG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -39.57% | +31.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.50% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -8.26% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.72% | — |
Volatility
CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCCB.TO | YAVG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.06% | 47.84% | -34.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 52.43% | -39.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 52.43% | -39.37% |
Dividends
CCCB.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Dividend Comparison
CCCB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than YAVG.NEO's 21.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CCCB.TO CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF | 3.97% | 1.93% |
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 21.76% | 8.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCCB.TO and YAVG.NEO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CIBC and Purpose Investments.
Find the right allocation for CCCB.TO and YAVG.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer