CGL.TO vs. XLK
CGL.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGL.TO is a Gold fund tracking the Gold Bullion, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CGL.TO returned 10.99%/yr vs 26.27%/yr for XLK. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGL.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
CGL.TO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CGL.TO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGL.TO achieves a -3.19% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 31.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CGL.TO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 10.99%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.27% annualized return.
CGL.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -3.25%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 27.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
XLK
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 31.13%
- 6M
- 30.81%
- 1Y
- 59.71%
- 3Y*
- 32.23%
- 5Y*
- 25.59%
- 10Y*
- 26.27%
CGL.TO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -3.19% | 60.08% | 25.70% | 11.26% | -1.07% | -4.58% | 23.41% | 16.58% | -3.19% | 11.68% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.13% | 18.92% | 31.93% | 52.31% | -23.15% | 34.68% | 40.21% | 43.68% | 6.59% | 25.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGL.TO and XLK is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2010 | 0.02 |
The correlation between CGL.TO and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGL.TO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
CGL.TO
XLK
CGL.TO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGL.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 3.52 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 10.37 | -7.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGL.TO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGL.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.96%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -38.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGL.TO and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGL.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.96% | -38.68% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.93% | -16.16% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -26.35% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -29.64% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.93% | -29.64% | +4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.50% | -5.87% | -16.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.30% | -7.56% | -12.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.66% | 5.48% | +3.18% |
Volatility
CGL.TO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) is 7.67%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that CGL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGL.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | 10.83% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.08% | 19.12% | +4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 22.68% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 25.91% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 25.57% | -9.04% |
CGL.TO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGL.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGL.TO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
CGL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGL.TO and XLK have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CGL.TO.
CGL.TO is categorized as Gold, while XLK is Technology Equities. CGL.TO tracks Gold Bullion, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CGL.TO and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for CGL.TO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer