PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGJIX vs. CEFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGJIX achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than CEFIX's 30.49% return.


CGJIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.47%
YTD
9.65%
6M
8.62%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
18.01%

CEFIX

1D
0.10%
1M
10.32%
YTD
30.49%
6M
31.60%
1Y
58.97%
3Y*
28.42%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
9.65%14.56%27.74%36.66%-26.84%26.13%38.69%10.30%
CEFIX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund
30.49%38.50%11.21%11.61%-15.07%0.27%15.35%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CGJIX and CEFIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019

0.65

The correlation between CGJIX and CEFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGJIX vs. CEFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGJIX
CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

CEFIX
CEFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CEFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGJIXCEFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.59

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.33

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

16.81

-7.04

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the CEFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGJIX and CEFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGJIX drawdown since its inception was -31.18%, roughly equal to the maximum CEFIX drawdown of -30.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGJIX and CEFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGJIXCEFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.18%

-30.73%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-13.87%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-13.87%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-24.41%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

0.00%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-9.54%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.57%

-0.88%

Volatility

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) is 5.34%, while Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund (CEFIX) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that CGJIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGJIXCEFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

10.83%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

18.54%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

20.15%

-5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

15.95%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

17.78%

+2.31%

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGJIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGJIX vs. CEFIX - Dividend Comparison

CGJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than CEFIX's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CEFIX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement Fund
2.40%3.13%1.76%3.20%5.51%4.57%0.13%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
2.78%3.05%2.04%0.53%0.51%1.85%1.76%1.64%5.72%2.19%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGJIX and CEFIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEFIX has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to CGJIX (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGJIX dropped -31.18% vs CEFIX's -30.73%.

CEFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGJIX and CEFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer