CGIOX vs. GRSPX
CGIOX (Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class R6) and GRSPX (Greenspring Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, CGIOX returned 11.86%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for GRSPX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGIOX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for GRSPX.
Performance
CGIOX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGIOX achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.59% return.
CGIOX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.17%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- —
GRSPX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 21.59%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
CGIOX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIOX Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class R6 | 12.17% | 17.85% | 21.05% | 20.78% | -18.19% | 21.47% | 20.18% |
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 21.59% | 6.12% | 16.03% | 11.95% | -8.62% | 26.89% | 23.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGIOX and GRSPX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between CGIOX and GRSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGIOX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank
CGIOX
GRSPX
CGIOX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class R6 (CGIOX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGIOX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.36 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.99 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.94 | 12.80 | +2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGIOX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.04 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.70 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
CGIOX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGIOX drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum GRSPX drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIOX and GRSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGIOX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -35.67% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -7.97% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -19.33% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.11% | -19.33% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -4.81% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.39% | -0.39% |
Volatility
CGIOX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class R6 (CGIOX) is 3.30%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that CGIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGIOX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 5.49% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 11.74% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.76% | 15.60% | -3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 15.57% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 15.36% | -0.44% |
CGIOX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGIOX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGIOX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison
CGIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, less than GRSPX's 7.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIOX Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class R6 | 7.20% | 8.07% | 5.43% | 4.65% | 4.62% | 6.12% | 2.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 7.73% | 9.40% | 7.14% | 6.84% | 8.04% | 7.69% | 2.39% | 7.89% | 11.05% | 9.63% | 6.81% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGIOX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRSPX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to CGIOX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIOX dropped -23.11% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.
CGIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGIOX and GRSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer