PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGIIX vs. CVTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class I (CGIIX) and Calamos Growth and Income Fund (CVTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIIX achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than CVTRX's 10.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CGIIX having a 12.92% annualized return and CVTRX not far behind at 12.72%.


CGIIX

1D
-0.74%
1M
-1.45%
6M
7.98%
YTD
9.96%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
12.92%

CVTRX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-0.73%
6M
8.65%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGIIX
Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class I
9.96%17.75%20.97%20.69%-18.25%21.35%22.71%26.30%-3.74%16.23%
CVTRX
Calamos Growth and Income Fund
10.64%17.46%20.66%20.36%-18.45%21.05%22.43%25.97%-3.97%16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIIX and CVTRX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 1997

0.99

The correlation between CGIIX and CVTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGIIX vs. CVTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIIX
CGIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CGIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CVTRX
CVTRX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CVTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CVTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class I (CGIIX) and Calamos Growth and Income Fund (CVTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGIIXCVTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.30

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

9.92

-0.53

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the CVTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIIX and CVTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIIX drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than CVTRX's maximum drawdown of -44.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIIX and CVTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGIIXCVTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.16%

-44.13%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-9.14%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.42%

-16.45%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.16%

-23.30%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.21%

-28.20%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-1.24%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-5.16%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.12%

-0.01%

Volatility

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class I (CGIIX) and Calamos Growth and Income Fund (CVTRX) have volatilities of 3.69% and 3.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGIIXCVTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.65%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

10.29%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

12.72%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

14.99%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

15.40%

+0.01%

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIIX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CVTRX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGIIX vs. CVTRX - Dividend Comparison

CGIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than CVTRX's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGIIX
Calamos Growth and Income Fund Class I
7.19%8.02%5.36%4.59%4.53%6.05%3.59%3.95%9.30%7.69%7.84%7.41%
CVTRX
Calamos Growth and Income Fund
6.61%7.38%4.83%4.18%4.02%5.52%3.22%3.56%8.61%7.21%7.31%6.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, CGIIX and CVTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CGIIX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to CVTRX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIIX dropped -49.16% vs CVTRX's -44.13%.

CVTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGIIX and CVTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer