PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGIC vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGIC vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGIC vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIC achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 9.83% return.


CGIC

1D
3.22%
1M
-8.07%
YTD
1.95%
6M
8.06%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDT

1D
3.59%
1M
-10.30%
YTD
9.83%
6M
17.39%
1Y
54.93%
3Y*
24.48%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGIC vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGIC vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIC
CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIC vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGICFDTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.86

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

3.48

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.55

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

4.01

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.97

16.70

-6.73

CGIC vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIC and FDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGICFDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.86

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.35

+0.88

Correlation

The correlation between CGIC and FDT is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGIC vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

CGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FDT's 3.24% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGIC
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
1.46%1.60%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
3.24%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%

Drawdowns

CGIC vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIC drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIC and FDT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGICFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-46.10%

+33.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-13.41%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

-10.30%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-10.86%

+8.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.22%

-0.36%

Volatility

CGIC vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) is 7.86%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that CGIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGICFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

9.73%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

13.97%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

19.35%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

17.86%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

18.32%

-2.53%