PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGIC vs. CGCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGIC vs. CGCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGIC vs. CGCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGIC
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
1.95%37.53%-2.81%
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
-1.79%16.62%7.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIC achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than CGCV's -1.79% return.


CGIC

1D
3.22%
1M
-8.07%
YTD
1.95%
6M
8.06%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGCV

1D
1.96%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGIC vs. CGCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGIC vs. CGCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIC
CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCV
CGCV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CGCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIC vs. CGCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGICCGCVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

0.82

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

1.22

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.22

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.97

5.22

+4.76

CGIC vs. CGCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the CGCV Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIC and CGCV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGICCGCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

0.82

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.98

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between CGIC and CGCV is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CGIC vs. CGCV - Dividend Comparison

CGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than CGCV's 1.57% yield.


Drawdowns

CGIC vs. CGCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIC drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, roughly equal to the maximum CGCV drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIC and CGCV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGICCGCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-13.13%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-10.34%

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

-6.13%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-1.68%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.41%

+0.45%

Volatility

CGIC vs. CGCV - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) at 4.19%. This indicates that CGIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGICCGCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

4.19%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

7.67%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

14.31%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

12.89%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

12.89%

+2.90%