CGIB vs. NXUS

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CGIB (Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)) and NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. CGIB is actively managed, while NXUS is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGIB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NXUS.

Performance

CGIB vs. NXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGIB having a 0.87% return and NXUS slightly lower at 0.84%.

CGIB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 0.57%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 1Y: 2.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NXUS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.01%
• 6M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIB vs. NXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	0.87%	0.66%
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	0.84%	0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIB and NXUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

CGIB vs. NXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIB

CGIB Risk / Return Rank: 25
CGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 26

NXUS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIB vs. NXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGIB	NXUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	—	—

Drawdowns

CGIB vs. NXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIB drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, roughly equal to the maximum NXUS drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIB and NXUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGIB	NXUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-2.81%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.97%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-0.89%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGIB	NXUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.06%	3.70%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.75%	3.70%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.75%	3.70%	+0.05%

CGIB vs. NXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NXUS's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGIB vs. NXUS - Dividend Comparison

CGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than NXUS's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	1.45%	4.26%	1.65%
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	1.95%	0.39%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGIB and NXUS in my portfolio?

CGIB and NXUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGIB or NXUS?

On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGIB or NXUS?

NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CGIB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGIB or NXUS?

NXUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.45% for CGIB.

What is the main difference between CGIB and NXUS?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CGIB and 0.08% for NXUS.