CGIB vs. NXUS
CGIB (Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)) and NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. CGIB is actively managed, while NXUS is passively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGIB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NXUS.
Performance
CGIB vs. NXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGIB achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than NXUS's 0.22% return.
CGIB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 1.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.59%
NXUS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.42M | $3.64M | $2.75M | |
| $4.81M | $3.59M | $4.71M |
CGIB vs. NXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) | 0.36% | 0.66% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.22% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGIB and NXUS is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGIB vs. NXUS — Risk / Return Rank
CGIB
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGIB vs. NXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGIB | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGIB vs. NXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGIB drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, roughly equal to the maximum NXUS drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIB and NXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGIB | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -2.81% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -1.59% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -0.93% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility
CGIB vs. NXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGIB | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 3.66% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 3.66% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 3.66% | +0.08% |
CGIB vs. NXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGIB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NXUS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGIB vs. NXUS - Dividend Comparison
CGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than NXUS's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) | 1.45% | 4.26% | 1.65% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.96% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGIB and NXUS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CGIB.
NXUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.45% for CGIB.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CGIB and 0.08% for NXUS.
Find the right allocation for CGIB and NXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer