CGIB vs. FOPC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGIB (Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)) and FOPC (Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGIB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while FOPC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Frontier. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGIB returned 2.83% vs 4.52% for FOPC. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGIB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FOPC.

Performance

CGIB vs. FOPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FOPC's 0.58% return.

CGIB

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 2.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FOPC

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIB vs. FOPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	0.50%	4.72%	-0.11%
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	0.58%	6.54%	-0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIB and FOPC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.55

The correlation between CGIB and FOPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CGIB vs. FOPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIB

CGIB Risk / Return Rank: 22
CGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
CGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 21
CGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FOPC

FOPC Risk / Return Rank: 46
FOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIB vs. FOPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGIB	FOPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	1.59	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	2.36	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.29	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	2.08	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	7.03	-4.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGIB vs. FOPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the FOPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIB and FOPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGIB	FOPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	1.59	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	1.59	-0.51

Drawdowns

CGIB vs. FOPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIB drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, which is greater than FOPC's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIB and FOPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGIB	FOPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-2.18%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-2.18%	-0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-0.86%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-0.41%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	0.65%	+0.40%

Volatility

CGIB vs. FOPC - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) at 1.03%. This indicates that CGIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGIB	FOPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	1.03%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.92%	2.19%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	2.86%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	3.10%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	3.10%	+0.66%

CGIB vs. FOPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FOPC's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGIB vs. FOPC - Dividend Comparison

CGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, which matches FOPC's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	4.26%	4.26%	1.65%
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	4.26%	4.42%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGIB and FOPC in my portfolio?

CGIB and FOPC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGIB or FOPC?

CGIB has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to FOPC (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIB dropped -2.68% vs FOPC's -2.18%.

Which ETF is better, CGIB or FOPC?

On 1-year performance, FOPC leads with 4.52% vs 2.83% for CGIB. On fees, CGIB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FOPC has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGIB or FOPC?

Over the 1-year period, FOPC has performed better with a 4.52% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGIB or FOPC?

CGIB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FOPC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGIB or FOPC?

CGIB and FOPC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.26%.

What is the main difference between CGIB and FOPC?

CGIB is categorized as Global Bonds, while FOPC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CGIB and 0.87% for FOPC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.