CGIAX vs. FAOSX
CGIAX (American Funds International Growth and Income Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CGIAX returned 8.21%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGIAX charges 0.93%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
CGIAX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CGIAX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CGIAX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIAX American Funds International Growth and Income Fund | 10.74% | 35.04% | 3.26% | 15.22% | -15.49% | 9.79% | 7.73% | 27.06% | -14.45% | 22.07% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGIAX and FAOSX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CGIAX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGIAX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
CGIAX
FAOSX
CGIAX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGIAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.95 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | -0.30 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | -0.49 | +9.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGIAX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGIAX drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FAOSX drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIAX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGIAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.78% | -36.24% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -7.26% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.58% | -13.96% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.93% | -36.24% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -5.86% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -7.92% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 4.17% | -1.25% |
Volatility
CGIAX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGIAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 0.00% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 3.51% | +8.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 8.70% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 16.70% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 16.63% | -0.85% |
CGIAX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGIAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGIAX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
CGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIAX American Funds International Growth and Income Fund | 6.97% | 8.13% | 3.34% | 2.27% | 3.99% | 6.90% | 1.35% | 2.36% | 2.74% | 1.80% | 2.29% | 3.17% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGIAX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGIAX has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIAX dropped -35.78% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
CGIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGIAX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer