CGGR vs. ILCG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGGR (Capital Group Growth ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CGGR is actively managed, while ILCG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGGR returned 25.62%/yr vs 26.58%/yr for ILCG. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CGGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.

Performance

CGGR vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGR achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.41% return.

CGGR

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 21.70%
• 3Y*: 25.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILCG

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 6.73%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 28.93%
• 3Y*: 26.58%
• 5Y*: 14.94%
• 10Y*: 18.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGR vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	6.16%	19.75%	32.12%	42.18%	-18.50%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	14.41%	16.71%	32.82%	40.41%	-20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGR and ILCG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.95

The correlation between CGGR and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGGR vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGGR	ILCG
Technology	37.9%	49.8%
Communication Services	16.9%	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.0%	10.6%
Healthcare	9.2%	5.3%
Industrials	7.5%	8.3%
Financial Services	5.2%	6.0%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.1%
Energy	2.2%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	1.6%
Utilities	0.9%	0.8%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.4%

Return for Risk

CGGR vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGR

CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 36
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 47
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGR vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGGR	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.78	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.41	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.86	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.31	6.54	-1.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGGR vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGR and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGR	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.78	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.59	+0.19

Drawdowns

CGGR vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGR drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGR and ILCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGR	ILCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.90%	-52.98%	+24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-15.65%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	-23.10%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-1.08%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-8.22%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	4.43%	-0.33%

Volatility

CGGR vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is 4.17%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that CGGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGGR	ILCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	4.39%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	12.81%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	16.30%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	21.99%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	21.53%	+0.24%

CGGR vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGR vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

CGGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than ILCG's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	0.09%	0.10%	0.33%	0.40%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.40%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGR and ILCG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CGGR and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGGR or ILCG?

ILCG has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to CGGR (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGR dropped -28.90% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

Which ETF is better, CGGR or ILCG?

On 3-year performance, ILCG leads with 26.58% vs 25.62% for CGGR. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CGGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGGR or ILCG?

Over the 3-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 25.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGR or ILCG?

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGR or ILCG?

ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.09% for CGGR.

What is the main difference between CGGR and ILCG?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGR and 0.04% for ILCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.