CGGR vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGGR (Capital Group Growth ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CGGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

CGGR vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CGGR

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 21.70%
• 3Y*: 25.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGR vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	-0.72%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGR and GRW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	1.00

CGGR vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGGR	GRW
Technology	37.9%	26.6%
Communication Services	16.9%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.0%	8.3%
Healthcare	9.2%	4.1%
Industrials	7.5%	38.1%
Financial Services	5.2%	9.8%
Basic Materials	2.3%	4.0%
Energy	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	-
Utilities	0.9%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

CGGR vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGR

CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 36
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGR vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGGR	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.31	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGR	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	13.58	-12.80

Drawdowns

CGGR vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGR drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGR and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGR	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.90%	-0.45%	-28.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-0.27%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-0.17%	-7.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGR	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	8.89%	+7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	8.89%	+12.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	8.89%	+12.88%

CGGR vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGR vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

CGGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	0.09%	0.10%	0.33%	0.40%	0.33%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGR and GRW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, CGGR and GRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CGGR or GRW?

On fees, CGGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGR or GRW?

CGGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGR or GRW?

CGGR has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between CGGR and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGR and 0.75% for GRW.