PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGGO vs. IMFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGGO vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGGO vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
-3.69%21.08%14.80%23.43%-13.12%
IMFL
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
7.24%30.89%-3.57%25.51%-7.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a -3.69% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 7.24% return.


CGGO

1D
3.92%
1M
-9.37%
YTD
-3.69%
6M
-1.23%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
10Y*

IMFL

1D
3.30%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
7.24%
6M
16.45%
1Y
33.09%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGGO vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGGO vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGO
CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IMFL
IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGO vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGGOIMFLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

2.00

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

2.61

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

2.69

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.50

10.54

-4.04

CGGO vs. IMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the IMFL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGO and IMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGGOIMFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.00

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CGGO and IMFL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGGO vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than IMFL's 3.15% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
2.10%2.03%1.10%0.76%0.59%0.00%
IMFL
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
3.15%2.88%3.56%3.85%3.35%3.94%

Drawdowns

CGGO vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and IMFL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGGOIMFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-33.26%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.15%

-11.77%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-8.70%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-7.37%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.00%

+0.06%

Volatility

CGGO vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) at 7.94%. This indicates that CGGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGGOIMFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

7.94%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

11.84%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

16.63%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

15.89%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

15.86%

+2.51%